User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows CE; U; Mobile; iPhone; PPC; en) AppleWebKit/522+ (KHTML, like Gecko) WM5 Iris/1.0.14 Safari/419.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-iris.yaml
Iris 1.0.14Windows Mobile 5.0Webkit 522mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.074 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 419.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 419.3closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit Windows CE AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeWindows CEcloseiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iris 1.0.14closeWindows CE AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 1.0.14closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iris Browser 1.0.14WebKit 522Windows Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.373 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iris 1.0.14Webkit 522Windows Mobile 5.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS AppleiPhoneFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:09 | by ThaDafinser