User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 4.2.1; xx; Lenovo A830) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.2.365 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 9.4Android 4.2.1Gecko LenovoA830mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.4U2 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux MicromaxA110Qmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 Android 4.2LenovoA830smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.2closeAndroid 4.2.1LenovoA830closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.2.365 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.85309 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Gecko Android 4.2.1LenovoA830mobile:smartyescloseclose0.036 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:08 | by ThaDafinser