User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; en-us; GFIVE Glory Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.4.1.362 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
GfiveGlory Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.4U3 Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4WebKit Android 4.0yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.1closeAndroid 4.0.4GfiveGlorycloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.1.362WebKit 533.1Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Webkit 533.1Android 4.0.4GFIVE Glorymobile:smartyescloseclose0.086 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:08 | by ThaDafinser