User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 4.0.3; fr-FR; Transformer TF101) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.2.0.308 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
UC Browser 9.2.0.308Android 4.0.3 AsusTransformer TF101tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U2 Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux CelkonA97imobile-browseryescloseclose0.24402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2 Android 4.0AsusTransformer TF101tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0closeAndroid 4.0.3AsusTransformer TF101closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.13801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.308 Linux AsusAsus Transformer Pad TF101closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Gecko Android 4.0.3AsusEee Pad Transformertabletyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:07 | by ThaDafinser