User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 2.2.2; zh-CN; HTC HD7 LTE 4G+ For AT&T) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.5.1.381 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 9.5Android 2.2.2Gecko HTCHD7mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U2 Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux HTCDesiremobile-browseryescloseclose0.35103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5 Android 2.2HTCHD7 LTEsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.1closeAndroid 2.2.2HTCHD7 LTE 4G+ For AT&Tcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.1.381 Linux HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Gecko Android 2.2.2HTCHD7mobile:smartyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:07 | by ThaDafinser