User agent detail

HTC_P3701/1.37.621.2 Mozilla/4.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.11)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCP3701 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 7.11Trident 3.1WinCE Mobile Phoneyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 7.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 7.11closeWindows HTCP3701mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 7.11Trident Windows CE HTCP3701smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 7.11closeWindows CE HTCP3701closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 7.11closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile Windows HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile 6.1HTCTouch Diamondmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile HTCP3701Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:07 | by ThaDafinser