User agent detail

Safari/9537.73.11 CFNetwork/673.0.3 Darwin/13.0.2 (x86_64) (MacBookPro11%2C1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
Safari 7.0MacOSX 10.9unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 7.0WebKit MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 9537.73.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari closeOS X 10.9desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac 10.9desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 673.0.3closeMac OS X 10.9.0AppleMacBookPro11,1closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.13401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 7.1closeMac OS X 10.9.0Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:07 | by ThaDafinser