User agent detail

BUbiNG (+http://law.di.unimi.it/BUbiNG.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
yesBUbiNG BotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesBUbiNG BotBot/Crawler0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
BUbiNG closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesBUbiNGclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBUbiNGcrawler0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBUbiNGclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:06 | by ThaDafinser