User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux armv7l) KHTML/4.10.4 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-konqueror.yaml
Konqueror 4.10Linux KHTML 4.10.4desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.10KHTML 4.10Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.10closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.10KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.10closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.10 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.10KHTML 4.10.4Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:05 | by ThaDafinser