User agent detail

MQQBrowser/2.7/Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows Phone OS 7.5; Trident/5.0; IEMobile/9.0; HTC; SurroundT8788)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCSurroundT8788 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 2.7closeWindows 7.5GenericWindows Phone 7.5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 2.7Trident Windows Phone 7.5HTCSurroundT8788smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 2.7closeWindows Phone 7.5HTCSurroundT8788closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.05301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 2.7Trident 5.0Windows Phone HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 2.7Trident 5.0Windows Phone 7.5HTC7 Surroundmobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone 7.5Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:05 | by ThaDafinser