User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Safari/536.25 QHBrowser/2.0.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-360.yaml
Qihoo 360 Browser 2.0.3iOS Webkit 536.26mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.0WebKit MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 6.0closeOS X 10.8desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 6.0WebKit Mac 10.8desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0closeOS X 10.8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 6.0closeMac OS X 10.8closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0closeOS X 10.8closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 6.0WebKit 536.26Mac OS X 10.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Qihoo 360 Browser 2.0.3Webkit 536.26iOS mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 6.0.5closeMac OS X 10.8.4Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:05 | by ThaDafinser