User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; ME371MG Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
Chrome 38.0Android 4.1unknown AsusFonepad ME371MGTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.1AsusFonepad ME371MGTabletyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.1AsusFonepadphabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 38.0.2125closeAndroid 4.1.2AsusME371MGcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 38Blink Android 4.1.2AsusFonepadtabletyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 28closeAndroid 4.1AsusME371MGTabletyesyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:05 | by ThaDafinser