User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 SymbianOS/9.3; U; Series60/3.2 Samsung/SGH-L870-ORANGE/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-L870-ORANGE Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 3.2SamsungSGH-L870mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2 Symbian OS Series 60 3.2SamsungSGH-L870-ORANGEsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2closeSymbian OS 9.3SamsungSGH-L870-ORANGEcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 closeSymbianOS 9.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.13701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0 Symbian Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 3.2SamsungSGH-L870mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SymbianOS closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:04 | by ThaDafinser