User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_windows.yaml
Internet Explorer 8.0Windows 7 NT 6.1 pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 8.0Trident 4.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 8.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows 7desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 8.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 8(Compatibility View)closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:04 | by ThaDafinser