User agent detail

MOT-A760i/R501_G_00.06.A3I MIB/2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaA760i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaA760iMobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-A760i R501closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2close Motorolamobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaA760ismartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaA760icloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 2.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaA760imobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:04 | by ThaDafinser