User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_windows.yaml
Chrome 0.2.149.27Windows XP NT 5.1 pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 0.2WebKit WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 0.2.149.27closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 0.2.149.27closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 0.2WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 0.2.149.27closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 0.2.149closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 0.2.149.27closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 0.2.149.27WebKit 525.13Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Beta 0.2.149.27Webkit 525.13Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 0.2.149.27closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 0.2.149.6closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:04 | by ThaDafinser