User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; ARM; Trident/7.0; Touch; rv:11.0; WPDesktop; NOKIA; Nokia 520T; CMCC) like Gecko
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsphone.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 11.0Windows Phone 8.1Trident 7.0NokiaLumia 520mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 11.0Trident 7.0WinPhone8.1 8.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.146 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 11.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident Windows RT NokiaNokia 520Tsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 11.0closeWindows RT Nokia520Tcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Windows NT 6.2Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Phone 8.1NokiaLumia 520mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11closeWindows 8Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:03 | by ThaDafinser