User agent detail

MQQBrowser/Mini2.4 (Nokia6288/06.43)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6288 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QQbrowser Mini 2.4WebKit JAVA Mobile Phoneyesyes0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MQQBrowser Mini2.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser Mini2.4close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia6288smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 06.43)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mini 2.4close Nokia6288closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6288closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser Mini 2.4 Nokia6288mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:02 | by ThaDafinser