User agent detail

Opera/9.26 (Windows 95; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.26Windows 95 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.26Presto 2.0Win95 95Windows DesktopDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.26closeWindows 95desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.26Presto Windows 95desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.26closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.26closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.26closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.26 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.26 Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.26closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:02 | by ThaDafinser