User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.3; zh-cn; TCL J636D+ Build/JLS36C) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 MicroMessenger/6.0.0.54_r849063.501 NetType/WIFI
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
WeChat 6.0.0.54.r849063.501Android 4.3 TCLJ636D+smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.3GenericAndroid 4.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
WeChat 6.0 Android 4.3TCLJ636D+smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.3closeAndroid 4.3TCLJ636D+closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.08501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
WeChat 6.0.0.54Webkit 534.30Android 4.3TCLJ636mobile:smartyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.3closeAndroid 4.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:01 | by ThaDafinser