User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT-S7230E-ORANGE/S723EBVJJ1; U; Bada/1.0; fr-fr) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dolfin/2.0 Mobile WQVGA SMM-MMS/1.2.0 NexPlayer/3.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1 OPN-B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
NexPlayer 3.0Bada 1.0 SamsungGT-S7230Esmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0SamsungGT-S7230EMobile Phoneyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 2.0closeBada 1.0SamsungGT-S7230Emobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NexPlayer 3.0 Bada 1.0SamsungGT-S7230Esmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.0closeBada 1.0SamsungGT-S7230E-ORANGEcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.11001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 533.1 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.0Webkit 533.1Bada 1.0SamsungWave 723mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Dolfin Browser 2.0closeBada 1.0SamsungGT-S7230EFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:01 | by ThaDafinser