User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; en-; OPPOR8015 Build/GRK39F) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
OppoR8015 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.31103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3OPPOR8015smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.6closeAndroid 2.3.6OppoR8015closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6OppoFind Guitar R8015mobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:00 | by ThaDafinser