User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux armv7l) AppleWebKit/535.22+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/17.0.963.56 Chrome/17.0.963.56 Safari/535.22+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chromium.yaml
Chromium 17.0.963.56Linux Webkit 535.22desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 17.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 17.0.963.56closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 17.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 17.0.963closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 17.0.963.56WebKit 535.22Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 17.0.963.56Webkit 535.22Linux desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:00 | by ThaDafinser