User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SmartHub; SMART-TV; U; Linux/SmartTV) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) WebBrowser/1.0 SmartTV Safari/531.2+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Webkit 531.2SamsungSmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SmartTV WebBrowser 1.0 Linux Smartphone OS SamsungSmart TVTV Device0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Maple browser closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux SamsungSmart TVtv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 531.2closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.11801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 531.2Smart TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 531.2 SamsungSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:58 | by ThaDafinser