User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 2.3.6; zh-cn; Motorola_MOT-XT681; 480*854) UCWEB7.9.0.94/139/800
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaXT681 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9 GNU/Linux MotorolaMOTsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0closeAndroid 2.3.6MotorolaXT681closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9 Android 2.3.6MotorolaMOTO XT681mobile:smartyescloseclose0.036 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:58 | by ThaDafinser