User agent detail

MQQBrowser/3.6/Adr (Linux; U; 4.1.2; zh-cn; HUAWEI G610-C00 Build/G610-C00V100R001C92B120;540*960)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiG610-C00 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MQQBrowser 3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 3.6closeLinux SonyEricssonST25imobile-browseryescloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 3.6 GNU/Linux HuaweiG610-C00smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 3.6closeLinux HuaweiG610-C00closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 3.6 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 3.6 Android 4.1.2HuaweiAscend G610mobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonST25iSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:57 | by ThaDafinser