User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/25.0.1349.2 Chrome/25.0.1349.2 Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chromium.yaml
Chromium 25.0.1349.2FreeBSD Webkit 538.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 25.0.1349.2closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 25.0WebKit FreeBSD desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 25.0.1349closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 25.0.1349.2WebKit 538.1FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 25.0.1349.2Webkit 538.1FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 25.0.1364.99closeMac OS X 10.8.5Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:57 | by ThaDafinser