User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; Micromax A110Q Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.123 Mobile Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MicromaxA110Q Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.123closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364.123closeAndroid 4.2.1MicromaxA110Qmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 25.0WebKit Android 4.2MicroMaxA110Qsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.123closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.2.1MicromaxA110Qcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.123WebKit 537.22Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 4.2.1MicromaxA110 Canvas 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.123closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 31closeAndroid 4.2MicromaxA110QSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.066 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:57 | by ThaDafinser