User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/418.9 (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari) Safari/419.3 Cheshire/1.0.ALPHA
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Cheshire 1.0Mac WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari Safaricloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Cheshire 1.0.ALPHAcloseOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Cheshire 1.0WebKit Mac desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Cheshire 1.0.ALPHAcloseOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.10301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 418.9Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 418.9OS X desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:56 | by ThaDafinser