User agent detail

Mozilla/2.0 (compatible; MSIE 3.02; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320) BlackBerry7130/4.2.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/120
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
BlackBerry7130 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 2.0Gecko Desktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 3.02closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
BlackBerry Browser closeRIM OS RIMBlackBerry 7130mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 3.02Trident Windows CE RIMBlackBerry 7130smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 3.02closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
BlackBerry 7130closeWindows CE BlackBerry7130closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 3.02closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.10801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Blackberry Browser 4.2.1 BlackBerry OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 3.0.2 BlackBerry OS 4.2RIM240mobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 3.02closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile RIMBlackBerry 7130Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:56 | by ThaDafinser