User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.4.9999.1900 Safari/537.31 BDSpark/26.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Baidu Spark 26.4Windows 7WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 26.0WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.154 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.4.9999.1900closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 26.4.9999.1900closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Baidu Spark 26.4WebKit Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.4.9999.1900closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 26.4.9999closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 26.4.9999.1900closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 26.4.9999.1900WebKit 537.31Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Baidu Spark 26.4Webkit 537.31Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 26.4.9999.1900closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:55 | by ThaDafinser