User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 5978.98.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/37.0.2062.120 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
Chrome 37.0ChromeOS unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 37.0Blink ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.120closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.120closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 37.0Blink Chrome OS 5978.98desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.120closeChrome OS 37.0.2062.120closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 37.0.2062closeChrome OS 5978.98.1closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.120closeChrome OS 5978.98.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.120WebKit 537.36ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 37Blink Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.120closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 37.0.2062.120closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:55 | by ThaDafinser