User agent detail

ghosts-app/1.0.2.1 (ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.; X550CC; Windows 8 (X86); en)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AsusTeK Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ghosts-app 1.0.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.19902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 8AsusTeKsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows AsusTeKcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:55 | by ThaDafinser