User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 IceDragon/25.0.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
IceDragon 25.0.0.1Windows 8Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IceDragon 25.0Gecko 25.0Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 25.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IceDragon 25.0.0.1closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.20902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IceDragon 25.0Gecko Windows 8desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 25.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 25.0closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.077 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 25.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.09701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Comodo IceDragon 25.0.0.1Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Comodo IceDragon 25.0Gecko 25.0Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 25.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 25.0closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:54 | by ThaDafinser