User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DirectFB; Linux sh4) AppleWebKit/537.6+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/17.0.963.56 Chrome/17.0.963.56 Safari/537.6+HbbTV/1.1.1 (;iWedia;Teatro;3.0;;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Webkit 537.6iWediaTeatrotelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 17.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 17.0.963.56closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 17.0WebKit GNU/Linux SonyKDL40HX750tv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux iWediaTeatrocloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 17.0.963.56WebKit 537.6Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.6 iWediaTeatrotelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:54 | by ThaDafinser