User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; SHV-E160L Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSHV-E160L Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547.72closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungSHV-E160Lmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 29.0Blink Android 4.0SamsungSHV-E160Lsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungSHV-E160Lcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.10301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.72WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Android 4.0.4SamsungGalaxy Notemobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.72closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 29closeAndroid 4.0SamsungSHV-E160LSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.063 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:54 | by ThaDafinser