User agent detail

SonyEricssonW20/R7CA Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0 sonyericssonw20/UC Browser7.7.1.88/69/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonW20 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.7WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonW20 R7CAcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 7.7.1.88close Sony EricssonZylomobile-browseryescloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.7 Sony EricssonZylofeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.7.1close SonyEricssonW20closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.7.1.88 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson W20closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.7Gecko Sony EricssonZylomobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.5close SonyEricssonW20Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:53 | by ThaDafinser