User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv6l; U; en) Presto/2.8.115 Version/11.10 AQUOS-AS/1.0 LC-40LE835X
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 11.10GNU/Linux Presto 2.8.115SharpLC-40LE835Xtv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.10Presto 2.8Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.80closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.29203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.10Presto GNU/Linux SharpLC-40LE835Xtv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.10 AQUOS-AS/1.0 LC-40LE835XcloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.10closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.10Presto 2.8.115Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.0Presto 2.8.115 SharpLE835X Aquos TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l HTCMDA Vario VFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:53 | by ThaDafinser