User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; SGP321 Build/10.1.1.A.1.253) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 18.0.1025.166Android 4.1.2WebKit SonyXperia Tablet Ztablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.1SonyXperia Tablet Z LTETabletyesyes0.114 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.1SonyXperia Tablet Ztabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.1.2SonySGP321closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.1.2SonyXperia Tablet Ztabletyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.1SonySGP321Tabletyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:53 | by ThaDafinser