User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; U; Series60/5.0 Nokia5800-1/40.0.001 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Safari/525
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia5800-1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 3.0 SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.116 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.4Nokiamobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser 7.0WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0Nokia5800-1smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 40.0.001closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.4Nokia5800-1closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 Nokia BrowsercloseSymbianOS 9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 525NokiaOS NokiaNokia 5800-1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 525Series60 5.0Nokia5800 XpressMusicmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:53 | by ThaDafinser