User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); xx; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 CentOS/3.6-2.el5.centos Firefox/3.6.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 3.6.13CentOS 5Gecko 1.9.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.051 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.13closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.24102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko CentOS 3.6desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.13closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.13closeCentOS closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.13closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.13Gecko 20101209Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.13Gecko 1.9.2CentOS 5desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.13closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:53 | by ThaDafinser