User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.45 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
Chrome 18.0WinVista 6.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.45closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.45closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Windows Vistadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.45closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.45closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.45WebKit 535.19Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.45closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:52 | by ThaDafinser