User agent detail

J2ME/UCWEB7.0.3.45/139/7684
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 7.0 Gecko mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
J2ME UCWEB7.0.3.45closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.0 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.0.3close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.0.3.45close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.0.3.45 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.0Gecko mobile:featureyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:52 | by ThaDafinser