User agent detail

SonyEricssonK610c/R1CB Browser/NetFront/3.3 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonK610c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.3NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonK610c R1CBcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.3closeJVM SonyEricssonK610cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.3NetFront Sony EricssonK610cfeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.3close SonyEricssonK610ccloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Sony EricssonSony Ericsson K610ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.3 Sony EricssonK610cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.3close SonyEricssonK610cFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:52 | by ThaDafinser