User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.4; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2181.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Chrome 40.0Win10 6.4unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 40.0Blink Win10 6.4Windows DesktopDesktop0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2181.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 40.0.2181.0closeWindows 6.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 40.0Blink Windows 10desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2181.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 40.0.2181closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 40.0.2181.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2181.0WebKit 537.36Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 40.0.2181.0Blink Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2181.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.084 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:51 | by ThaDafinser