User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; U; en-US) Gecko/20081217 Vision-Browser/8.1 221x374 Pantech CDM8999
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PantechCDM8999 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeBrew PantechCruxmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux AudiovoxCDM-8999smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux PantechCDM8999closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0Gecko 20081217Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko Brew PantechCruxmobile:featureyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux PantechCDM8999Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.038 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:50 | by ThaDafinser