User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; baidubrowser 1.x)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 8.0Trident 4.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Baidu Browser 1.xcloseWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Baidu Browser 1Trident Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Baidu Browser 1closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.37004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:50 | by ThaDafinser