User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows Mobile; Opera Mini/5.1.21595/32.1214; U; xx) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Opera Mini 5.1Windows Mobile Presto 2.8.119mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.2WinMobile Mobile Deviceyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 5.1.21595closeWindows LGVN270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 5.1Presto Windows Mobile yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 5.1.21595close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 5.1.21595closeWindows Mobile closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 5.1.21595closeWindows Mobile closecloseclosecloseclose0.12101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 5.1.21595Presto 2.8.119Windows Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 5.1Presto 2.8.119Windows Mobile mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.1close OperaMini 5Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:50 | by ThaDafinser