User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008072503 CentOS/3.0.1-1.el4.centos Firefox/3.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 3.0.1CentOS 4Gecko 1.9.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.0Gecko 1.9.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.0.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.0Gecko CentOS 3.0desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.0.1closeCentOS closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.0.1Gecko 2008072503Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.0.1Gecko 1.9.0CentOS 4desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:50 | by ThaDafinser