User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-US; Lenovo A369i Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.1.0.297 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
UC Browser 9.1Android 4.2unknown LenovoA369iMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.1U3 Android 4.2LenovoA369iMobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.1.0.297closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA369mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.1WebKit Android 4.2LenovoA369ismartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.1.0closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA369icloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.11501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.1.0.297WebKit 534.31Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.1Webkit 534.31Android 4.2.2LenovoA369mobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2LenovoA369Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:48 | by ThaDafinser